| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
161. Possibly the best mash up trailer I've seen. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ummmm. Thats pretty bad. were you being sacracastic OP? I got to 1 minute then had to turn off because of the crap and totally unsuitable music. Its a travesty how they could turn the excellent origins trailer into something that bad.
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 10:43:00
|
162. If you had a day with no work on the todo list would you rather... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chribba wrote: Sure, depending on her personality ofc. Although we'd have to discuss Iceland since I am currently not located there... LOL. Chribba has become such a mythical figure of Eve that people now even think he lives under a desk at...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 08:35:00
|
163. An Encounter with The Ferryman - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Komen wrote: You should've killed him. Instead he didn't learn a thing from this, and was probably just killed in a similar situation later. Some people need a good kicking to get the message across. You didn't understand the story. The point...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 07:26:00
|
164. The Future Of The Rorqual - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: I'm of the opinion that forcing boosts in general on grid is dumb, but CCP would have to be ******** to force mining boosts on grid without at least moving the Rorqual's boosting bonuses from the Industrial Core to the h...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 07:20:00
|
165. The Future Of The Rorqual - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
mechtech wrote: I like the increased risk from going into siege. The idea is that you should bring along combat support to support the mining fleet, or at least have support on call. The trouble with this is that most alliances can call an un...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 07:09:00
|
166. The Future Of The Rorqual - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yes I pretty much agree. I actually think the rorqual has pretty good offensive capabilities right now, and defensively it isn't bad either at at all. The big thing for me though is you are stuck for 5 minutes so once you commit the ship to a sieg...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 07:05:00
|
167. Sticky:Feedback Request: System transition - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Octoven wrote: For those of you who are having motion sickness issues, its probably from the end of the effect when your cam swing back around to the gate. Ehh I for one could do with out that; however, the one starting the effect, Ive found th...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 05:46:00
|
168. Sticky:Feedback Request: System transition - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
TurAmarth ElRandir wrote: Rebecha Pucontis wrote: Disappointing to be honest. I had a feeling this really nice jump animation would be dumbed down for all the wet blankets complaining of motion sickness . As a medical professional even said...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 05:43:00
|
169. Ali Aras for CSM8 -- More balance, less bullshit - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I picked it up because I noticed one of her forum posts displayed an evident lack of knowledge regarding game mechanics, so I delved a little deeper and was surprised that such a young player has been elected to the CSM and was trying to work out ...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 05:37:00
|
170. The Future Of The Rorqual - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Greetings all. I've been wondering for some time how to make best use of the abilities of this great ship. Currently I have used them only in a POS for compressing ore, but not much else, which seems a shame for a ship which has so many potential ...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 05:29:00
|
171. No Defending Navy!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Masrina Yasmin wrote: What's the problem? The problem is the Navy should be attacking him in Jita, as I highly doubt this is an intentional mechanic put in place by CCP. I would have thought that is pretty obvious.
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 04:10:00
|
172. Sticky:Feedback Request: System transition - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Utremi Fasolasi wrote: System entry, at the destination - not gate entry in the start system. LTR. Entry can mean either entry to the stargate, or exit of the stargate. So can be interpreted both ways correctly. A more correct terminology wo...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 03:56:00
|
173. pos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
By the way, has anyone found where we can get the new personal hangars from yet?
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.12 03:51:00
|
174. No Defending Navy!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dav Varan wrote: Rebecha Pucontis wrote: This exploit really sucks. Any chance of a comment from CCP on this? There is no exploit. There is just a bunch of players who don't understand game mechanics very well. I don't think OP should ...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.11 19:36:00
|
175. No Defending Navy!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This exploit really sucks. Any chance of a comment from CCP on this?
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.11 17:46:00
|
176. Wars against new player friendly corps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
How do you eliminate competition.... You do it by killing off a possible hostile corporation before it has even begun by targeting its newbs. Sorry your having a bad experience, but this is a perfectly legitimate tactic to use. Your corporation ...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.11 17:36:00
|
177. No Defending Navy!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm guessing it is some kind of standings exploit/glitch after watching the video. I have seen other players completely dispatch the Navy before, but your saying they still spawn for you but not for him, so I'm not sure how this works either.
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.11 11:32:00
|
178. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Noztra Ernaga wrote: Ok, keep the DSP then but make signature signal strength completely random. Why? Kind of defeats the purpose of having a DSP for most cases. You can easily use the DSP scanning method now with the onboard scanner so CCP h...
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.11 11:17:00
|
179. Unacceptable blindspots in the 'Spread' probe formation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Cant you just drag them closer together using shift and alt? But yes, no blind spots should be the default setup.
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.11 11:14:00
|
180. No Defending Navy!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think if they destroy all of the Navy ships and then perhaps they dont spawn again until after DT. Im not sure I've not tried it myself, but I've seen people who have killed the Navy ships before.
- by Rebecha Pucontis - at 2013.05.11 11:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |